| Reading the Bible Again |
|
Reading the Bible Again
Douglas S. Long
Umstead Park United Church of Christ
My time this morning honors the group that has delved into,
as a Lenten discipline recently, a study of Marcus Borg’s “Reading the Bible
Again for the First Time.” You may wonder at the title of that book. How is it
possible to read something again, for the first time?
I have a good example of how that happens.
I went out and bought a copy of Borg’s book about a month
ago so I could join the study… I began reading it with great interest in some
of Borg’s points, wishing I had encountered them earlier because they were so
useful in explaining Biblical matters…. and then last week as Joi and I were
talking in my office, she noticed the book on my desk and pointed out that I
had a copy on my shelf as well.
I took the book down and saw my name written on the inside
page... it was my book!... and realized I had indeed read it a few years ago
because it is quite well marked up with underlines and comments in the columns.
I had been reading Borg’s book again… as if for the first
time!
Perhaps that says more about my memory than anything else…
but truthfully I do think it exemplifies how most of us encounter the Bible. We
learn about it… read some stories… hear a sermon maybe… and some of it sticks
and some of it doesn’t. We can read the same story ten years later and say,
“Oh, that’s what that means!”
I printed the text Nicki read in the bulletin to help make a
couple of points that might “stick” with us longer than others have, or perhaps
we might see again for the first time.
The first is the opening section of The Gospel of Luke:
Luke 1:1-5
So many others have tried their hand at
putting together a story of the wonderful harvest of Scripture and history that
took place among us, using reports handed down by the original
eyewitnesses who served this Word with their
very lives.
Since I have investigated all the reports in
close detail, starting from the story's beginning, I decided to write it all
out for you, most honorable Theophilus,
so you can know beyond the shadow of a doubt
the reliability of what you were taught.
During the rule of Herod, King of Judea,
there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly order of
Abijah. His wife was a descendant of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth…
Notice how the author explains very clearly that this is one
of many accounts, that he is not an eye witness, that this is a compilation of
many reports handed down… and the writer is writing to, Theophilus… Theo- God- philo-
lover.. He is writing to the lovers of God.
So here is the story of Jesus, lovers of God… it begins when
Herod was King, and an obscure priest names Zechariah and his wife Elizabeth…
The author we know as Luke begins the Gospel as he
understands it.
Matthew told his version, and Mark his, and John his, and
many of you realize others told theirs as well but their stories didn’t make it
into the canon.
The Bible contains a plurality, a diversity, if you will, of
authors.
The second passage I arbitrarily included helps me make a
very different point. This is often quoted by biblical literalist to
substantiate the veracity of scripture. II Timothy
2 Timothy 3:16-17
All Scripture is inspired by God and is
useful for teaching the truth, rebuking error, correcting faults, and giving
instruction for right living,
so that the person who serves God may be
fully qualified and equipped to do every kind of good deed.
If a conversation emerges where a passage is question a
fundamentalist often jumps to the front (I’ve seen it happen many times) and
says “All scripture is inspired by God- II Timothy 3:16”
..which basically says, the Bible is true because it says it
is.
But more problematic, and difficult to explain to the scripture-quoter,
is that II Timothy was written before the Gospels were and that the scripture
referred to in the “All Scripture is inspired” quote could not have referred to
the NT at all because much of it had not been written much less compiled into
one volume, a movement which coalesced centuries later.
Such knowledge can be unsettling if one holds a view of the Bible
that claims it is perfect in every detail… the Words of God transcribed through
puppet fingers and bestowed upon humanity…
This is expressed in different ways. I learned, as a child,
the Bible was the inerrant, infallible Word of God (I had no idea what those
words meant, but I learned that definition)
Maybe you’ve heard the “God said it. I believe it, that
settles it” phrase… or more recently the articulation that B.I.B.L.E. is an
acronym for Basic Instruction Before Leaving Earth.
I couldn’t disagree more. I think it’s much more about the
here and now.
In fact, in trying to succinctly describe the Bible I’ve
come up with a couple of definitions that are helpful to me, anyway. I’ll quickly
list two and then use the rest of my time to explore a third explanation.
So here are more accurate definitions, I believe, of the
Bible:
1) The
Bible is the word of God, filtered
through human words and culture.
2) Here is another …and this is directly from
Borg: The Bible is not the word of God, but it is human words in response to
God.
3) …and
yet a third: The Bible is a divine dialogue focused around this question: Who is God?
“The Bible,” I’ve said this many times
and in fact some of you have heard me say it and, in further fact, some of you
may recognize parts of this message as something you’ve heard before … while others
will be hearing it fresh … and still others will hear it, no doubt again, for
the first time (Someone at the Coordinating Council Meeting this past week said
I could preach the same two sermons every week because no one remembers what I
say anyway. They went on to say that probably depressed me. “Actually,” I
explained, “it’s quite the opposite. If I could get away with just having two
sermons in my repertoire I could save a
Back to the conversation at hand… The
Bible is a conversation, a debate, a dialogue, about who God is. It is a sacred
account of men and women struggling with the Divine. The images offered are not
so much based on fact as they are faith.
The Bible is a dialogue about God.
Novices to the Bible assume that there
is a chronological nature to it. What happens in the first chapters and books
must have been written first, and an orderly progression follows. This is
simply not correct. The book of Genesis, for example, was written far later
than much of the rest of what we refer to as the Old Testament, or better, the
Hebrew scriptures. Whereas other cultures may have preserved a more focused
coherent view of deity, what we have, recorded in our scriptures, is a
multiplicity of images…. And an eventual chaotic sort of progression in which,
in general terms, a warrior God of one people eventually is understood to be
more accurately a cosmic, compassionate God of all creation.
Now, outside the Biblical world view,
there were plenty of competing ideas about God… and certainly the framers of
the sacred texts we know as scripture were influenced by these as well. (We
still are.) The dominant culture of much of the day… Persia/Babylonia explained
God and the creation myth best through the epic of Gilgamesh… where the world
is created from warring gods… the spilt entrails of one forming the stuff from
which we have our being.
Is that God? Is that how we came to be?
A gifted Hebrew sage postulated the
beginning of all time this way…
“In the beginning… when the world was
wild and waste and without order… the spirit of God carefully hovered over it
all… fashioned it into being… willed it, molded it, breathed into it… and it
was good.”
Now folks… it goes without saying, but
of course I’m saying it… that there was no one there ‘In the beginning’ with a
pad and pencil taking notes so they could save the happenings for posterity.
There was no reporter on the scene. What we have here is an incredibly poetic,
marvelous faith-filled account of creation compiled by some gifted spirit so in
touch with the spirit of God that the wonder of this creation is captured in
the wonderful words of this account. Is it true?… More true than fact… It is
foundational truth.
The scriptures come to us more as story.
“Tell me a story about God, Father. Tell
me who God is, Mother. Rabbi, tell us of God. Tell us how God protected our
ancestors. Tell us how God will protect us.”
So … right now, rather quickly, let’s
look at some of the stories and what they say about God.
Let me offer three couplets of
scripture. Six passages which speak of the knowledge of God… I have chosen them
from the Hebrew Scriptures to avoid the common answer that the God of the Old
Testament is supplanted by the God of the New. I would also indeed claim that
Jesus brought a focused answer to the debate… but this morning I am not so much
interested in answering the question as offering insights. There are dozens,
scores, of such stories about “who God is” in this text. I’ve picked out six.
I’m going to read them, one at a time,
and then I’m going to ask you to help me, in a very general way, think about
what they say of God.
Are you with me?
Hear each of these as if they are the only story you have about who God is…
(and, in truth, you may be able to identify different religious groups as
having bought more into one than the other.)
So listen to the Bible as a divine
dialogue about who God is:
The First couplet: Genesis 3 and II
Samuel 6.
Genesis 3:8-9
When they heard the sound of God strolling in
the garden in the evening breeze, the Man and his Wife hid in the trees of the
garden, hid from God.
God called to the Man: "Where are
you?"
What sort of image of god does this
offer?
Walking
in the garden in the cool of the day
God is
just like us!
God
takes a stroll in the evening.
We
can talk to God as we talk to the person beside us.
God
is accessible, approachable, a ‘big’ us.
Are
you drawn to this image?
Now, II Samuel 6:6-7
A little context here. This in itself is
a great simplification, but for the sake of continuing… After the deliverance
from
In this passage, the people of
When they came to the threshing floor of
Nacon, the oxen stumbled, so Uzzah reached out and grabbed the Ark of God.
God blazed in anger against Uzzah and struck
him hard because he had profaned the Ark. Uzzah died on the spot, right
alongside the
So Uzzah touched the holy of holies and
for that crime was struck down.
As opposed to God walking in the cool of
the day, what image of God does this afford?
Unapproachable
Not
human
Holy
beyond all imagination
A
God who would kill any who would seek a commonality
God
is to be worshipped, but in no way accessed in immediacy.
Here is a second set of images:
2 Samuel 24 and I Chronicles 21
…an interesting couple of passages.
They both record the same story and it’s
not a particularly important story. It’s about a census, and trying to
establish the number of Israelites… but
listen to the beginning of each of the accounts…
2 Samuel 24:1-2 Yahweh (God) directs David to take the
census…
Once again God's anger blazed out against
So David gave orders to Joab and the army
officers under him, "Canvass all the tribes of
Just a few verses after God directs
David to take the census, God punishes David for doing so.
(It harkens back to hardening the heart
of the Pharaoh … remember that account?)
Interestingly, the Chronicler (I
Chronicles) tells the very same story but cleans it up. God wouldn’t be that
inconsistent! So here's the way the story begins in Chronicles:
I Chronicles 21:1-2
Now Satan entered the scene and seduced David
into taking a census of
David gave orders to Joab and the army
officers under him, "Canvass all the tribes of
Satan incites David to take the census….
Now which is it and why the switch?
(Some scholars argue that the whole
evolution of the Satan figure is to rescue the nasty side of life from
attributing it to God.)
Who is God?
Do you see the conversation going on
here?
And let's look at a third couplet.
Numbers 31 and Micah 6.
First, let’s look at Numbers.
The war God.
The Hebrews entering into the Promised
Land. Interesting isn’t it... the Promised Land. I never once in my Sunday
School years questioned why the Hebrews were allowed, actually encouraged to
kill all the peoples who had lived in ‘the promised land’ while they had been
absent for several generations. Think about it a moment. A clan of people leave
because drought forces them out. A couple of hundred years later they return.
“It’s ours,” they say... “It was
promised to us by a god you do not know.”
Ever wondered what the Philistine
account of all this would look like?
I learned in church at a very early age
to love God and hate the Philistines.
Hear this small portion of the account…
This is what God ordered them to do. …what God asked of the faithful.
Numbers
31:7-19
They attacked Midian, just as God had
commanded Moses, and killed every last man.
The People of Israel took the Midianite women
and children captive and took all their animals and herds and goods as plunder.
They burned to the ground all the towns in
which Midianites lived and also their tent camps.
They looted and plundered everything and
everyone - stuff and people and animals.
They took it all - captives and booty and
plunder - back to Moses and Eleazar the priest
(At least they saved
the women and children, we say! Oops… read on.)
Moses was furious with the army officers -
the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds - as they came back from
the battlefield:
"What's this! You've let these women
live!
Finish your job: kill all the boys. Kill
every woman who has slept with a man.
(At least they honored the virgins, we say. But
read on…)
The younger women who are virgins you can
keep alive for yourselves.
The
war god
Our
god.
No
other peoples count because they are not this god’s peoples.
What
if this was the only account of God you had?
People, there are those who still
worship THIS god as the primary manifestation of the Divine. It is the
patriotic war God. It is a convenient and often used god for all who would
build machines of war masquerading as keepers of peace. This god is not dead
among us.
Hear though, the contrast in the prophet
Micah. What is it that we are to be about? Who is God here?
Micah 6:6-8
How can I stand up before God and show proper
respect to the high God? Should I bring an armload of offerings topped off with
yearling calves?
Would God be impressed with thousands of
rams, with buckets and barrels of olive oil? Would he be moved if I sacrificed
my firstborn child, my precious baby, to cancel my sin?
But he's already made it plain how to live,
what to do, what God is looking for in men and women. It's quite simple: Do
what is fair and just to your neighbor, be compassionate and loyal in your
love, And don't take yourself too seriously - take God seriously.
What
is it that God requires of you? But to do justice, and love mercy, and walk
humbly with your God?
Do justice…
for all peoples
Love mercy…
not vengeance
Walk humbly.
Is this the
same God that commands Moses to go back and take out the women and children
too? I think not.
It is no wonder that Jesus was rejected
by the church of his day. The answer that he gave to the question, who is God,
was so off-center, so politically incorrect, so subversive to the ways of
humanity, that there was little left to do but eliminate him.
Love your enemies?
Do good to those who hate you?
Go the extra mile?
Live as a servant?
Always forgive.
Always offer compassion.
Always embrace.
Always love.
Jesus.
So here we sit today. The Church. The
ones who claim to follow the one who was right about God. We continue to
struggle with what it all means. We continue our efforts at being faithful.
Who is God?
There is a wonderful hymn in the UCC
hymnal… Deep In the Shadows of the Past. We will sing it in just a
moment. It describes with wonderful imagery and truth the story of the Bible…
which is the story of faithful dialogue about God. This God is mystery,
continually revealed.
The
account is clear. To know God is possible. To peg God closely… well, be careful
there, they’ve killed the last few messengers who did that.
Amen.
|
